Quote:
Originally Posted by LIGHTSOUT225
You forgot the fact that its standardized of the standardized standardized gametype.. the standard. lol. Are you serious? you made the original, yeh.. congrats, a great idea.. but through lots of research, ton of testing, and a shitload of discussion, it was improved upon by Furious. You need to accept that and stop putting it down, because that post was extremely condescending and insulting.
i mean if you feel you can improve more on it, then so be it, but im gonna need to see at LEAST as much hard evidence as Furious had when he undertook Conquest v2 for it to really be considered the marquee conquest variant, and definitely in a much less condescending tone.
|
However he recreated the gametype without permission and called it v2. I know that if anyone else would have done that they would have been accused of theft of intellectual property. So I have the right as the original creator to be condescending towards someone who took something from me.
And I don't need hard evidence. Furious D was doing research on the wrong parts of Conquest. He took away the essence of conquest. It became just a linear Flag Rally. He took away the team effort that is the focus of Conquest, the brute force that it takes to get just one territory. He cared too much about people only getting beatdowns. It's not the kills you get it's the teamwork that is involved in moving forward. In v2 and v3 all it takes is a single good sniper to take out a whole team and take the territory himself. That is not Conquest, that is flag rally. I dont' need proof for something I created. You think what you will about Conquest v2 and v3. The fact that the staff support a gametype that was stollen is very disgraceful to say the least.
I don't care that he changed it, but it would have been nice to know and to help him create a new standard for it. Do you know what it's like to find out that someone got B Faved for stealing your gametype? Kind of disappointing.
I dont' need your approval to have a standardized gametype let alone any hard evidence. I apologize if I don't meet the staff's standards... but I don't care what the staff thinks. Only what the community thinks. You guys can continue to play Conquest v3 and think that it's better if you would like. But for those that would like to see my rendition of what should have been done with the gametype in the first place please feel free to try the new version of
The Cellars and
Conquest.
I will come back with a link to the description of Conquest and it will cover the theory behind building a proper map that is smooth for Conquest... also Element and I will be releasing our Orbital Conquest Map soon as well. And Predicide I will keep you up to date with all of the maps that XF has for Conquest once we get the XF Official Gametype [XFOG] section up...